It can be easy to “talk the talk,” but much harder to “walk the walk” in matters, both personal and professional.

Our commitment at the Finney Law Firm and Ivy Pointe TItle, every day in every matter entrusted to us, is to place in to action the values we have embraced: 

  • Integrity: We must act properly in everything we do;
  • Accountability: We must meet our commitments;
  • Communication: We must inform others of performance of our commitments; and
  • Excellence: We must consistently deliver quality legal services.

This requires a focus, and a commitment, from each of our professionals to put these principles into action in our interactions with our clients, the Courts and other government officials, opposing parties and counsel, and the general public.

You can read more about our firm’s vision and values here.

If you share these values, please allow us to put our values into action for you!

Almost three years ago, the Michigan legislature took the extraordinary step of enacting right-to-work in the state, meaning no worker could be forced to pay dues to a labor union.  Wednesday, the Michigan Supreme Court extended that freedom of association to state employees as well.

A landmark case on right-to-work has been accepted by the United States Supreme Court in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association for the coming term. You may read about that here.

Read about the Michigan case here.

The Finney Law Firm is privileged to serve as co-counsel to the firm Graves Garrett from Kansas City, MO in the sole surviving case of Tea Party groups suing the Internal Revenue Service and others for illegal harassment and targeting.  You may read more about that here.

But Graves Garrett and its principals Todd Graves and Eddie Greim were also counsel for Wisconsin Club for Growth and its director, Eric O’Keefe, in important litigation to stop the illegal searches, seizures and prosecution in a “nearly three-year secret investigation that tried to muzzle conservative groups and cripple Governor Scott Walker.”

That work recently succeeded in a decision from the Wisconsin Supreme Court ordering that the investigation cease and that the prosecutors destroy copies of documents illegally obtained.

The Wall Street Journal recently praised that ruling in this editorial, and highlighted Graves Garrett’s role in bringing “the constitutional issues into focus.”  You may read that editorial here (behind the WSJ firewall).

Read Graves Garrett’s press release here.

I have had the privilege of getting to know Cincinnati Realtor and attorney Paul Sian recently.  He is a maven of social media and blogging, and I approached him to learn more about how he promotes his legal and real estate practice with these mostly free electronic tools.

He is a font of knowledge on that topic, and a trailblazer in bringing valuable information to the public.  For example, his blog is here, and I recommend following him on Twitter, Facebook and Google +.

Sunday of this last week we got together and produced this informative podcast on title insurance and some limited topics in real estate law.

If you are buying property, I’d recommend it for a short listen.

 

Chris Finney joins distinguished Judge Patrick F. Fischer, from Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals, and Maurice Thompson, Executive Director of the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, in a panel discussion before the Clermont Tea Party on August 4th on Judicial Activism: What is it and what can be done about it?  The event is 7 PM at the Holiday Inn in Eastgate  (4501 Eastgate Blvd, Cincinnati, OH 45245).

The Clermont Tea Party is organized by Ted Stevenot and Stuart Kennedy, and remains one of the largest regular gathering of Tea Party conservatives in Ohio if not the nation.  It has tremendous influence on politics in Clermont County.

The public is welcome.  Please join us.

 

 

It is in our human nature to trust other people.  We assume, for example, that if a seller is selling us a house, that he would not sell us a “bill of goods” and convey a house full of defects.  It is also in our nature that, when things go wrong, we look for someone other than ourselves to blame.  It is further in our nature to expect when we hire a professional to do a job, he will do it thoroughly and properly.

But in the case of purchasing real property, all of these instincts are just dead wrong.

First, people can and do fail to disclose material defects in real property when they sell it.  It happens all the time.

Second, as we explore here, the law of Ohio is firmly established as caveat emptor, or “buyer beware.”  This means that the burden unquestionably is on the buyer to “kick the tires” and confirm the condition of real property before buying it.

Third, be careful of even relying on your home inspector, as he likely will not stand behind his work.

Now, here are some tips that will try the patience of even the heartiest homebuyer:

1) Even if you do everything right: Ask all the right questions, and hire a home inspector, he might still miss something.  Massachusetts Realtor Bill Gassett, here, has a good blog entry today on things home inspectors — despite their best efforts — miss.

2) Let’s assume the home inspector missed something — something big!  Surely he will stand behind his work.  Unlikely.  Most home inspectors have a contractual provision that if they make a mistake, the limit of their liability is the amount you paid them.  And generally that is enforceable in Ohio.

3) If you are buying a foreclosure, or from a bank or an estate, they both (i) have no obligation to complete the Ohio residential property disclosure form, and (ii) they usually disclaim liability for home defects.  If you pursue them you are going to be mostly out of luck.

4) If a seller agrees to make repairs to a home before the closing, it is incumbent upon the buyer to check — before the closing — that the work was in fact done and done correctly.  The closing is an act of finality, and a buyer will claim a “waiver” of claims.  So, confirm all obligations are fulfilled before closing.

5) Finally, even if a buyer has a meritorious claim against a seller, a Realtor or an inspector arising from property defects, the odds are pretty good that he cannot afford to pursue those claims in litigation.

What all this means is that a buyer must really, really check out the property, the structure — from footer and foundation to roof, the mechanical systems — HVAC, plumbing, and electrical, and all appliances. For, once he closes, he has bought the property and it’s his.  The likelihood of him pursuing post-closing claims profitably is minimal.