Blog - Finney Law Firm

Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act: Protecting Expectant Mothers from Workplace Discrimination

By Samantha B. IsaacsNovember 15, 2023

Pregnancy is a momentous and life-changing event in a woman’s life. It’s a time of anticipation, excitement, and sometimes, anxiety. While many employers are supportive and accommodating during this period, there have been instances where pregnant women have faced discrimination in the workplace. Fortunately, there are legal protections in place to combat this injustice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, has made it clear that pregnancy discrimination is against the law.

Statutory protection against sex discrimination did not exist on the federal level until passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. However, for many years, pregnancy was not explicitly included as a protected category under Title VII. As a result, pregnant women were often the victims of gross injustice as they were denied promotions, demoted, or even fired solely because of their pregnancy. Women were often forced to choose between their career and starting a family. Thus, in 1978, Congress enacted the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) establishing that discrimination on the basis of pregnancy was a violation of Title VII.

The PDA was a vital amendment to Title VII, and it explicitly prohibited discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. This amendment clarified that employers could not treat pregnant employees less favorably than other employees based on their pregnancy status.

The PDA has several key provisions that ensure pregnant women are protected in the workplace:

Hiring and Employment: Employers are prohibited from refusing to hire a woman because she is pregnant, so long as she is able to perform the essential functions of the job. Pregnant women must be treated the same as any other job applicant and must be given the same opportunity for promotion.
Health Benefits: Pregnant employees are entitled to the same health benefits as other employees. This includes medical coverage for pregnancy-related expenses, such as prenatal care and childbirth.
Light Duty and Accommodations: Employers must provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant employees who need them, to the same extent they do for employees with short-term disabilities.
Protection for Retaliation: It is illegal for employers to retaliate against employees for asserting their rights under the PDA. This means that if a pregnant employee speaks up about discrimination or requests accommodations, the employer cannot take adverse action against her in response.

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act has been a significant step towards equality in the workplace as it establishes that employers are legally bound to treat pregnant employees with the same professional opportunities for growth, development, and job security as their non-pregnant colleagues.

However, despite these legal protections, pregnancy discrimination persists. Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy is both unethical and illegal. Therefore, it is important for women who believe they have been subjected to pregnancy discrimination to be aware of their rights and seek legal assistance if necessary. Employers and employees should consult experienced legal counsel to be fully advised of their rights and obligations under the law. If you or a close friend or family member needs assistance in this area, consult the Employment Team at the Finney Law Firm.

May I “stay” collections of a judgment pending the outcome of an appeal?

By Christopher P. FinneyNovember 5, 2023November 5, 2023

As clients “play out” the path of their litigation, they may plan on delaying the consequences of a possible loss at trial court for a year or two by “appealing all the way to the Supreme Court.” Comfortable that they can postpone payment of any possible judgment 24 to 36 months into the future, they continue with the path of defending a suit, they have figured out — before we ever speak about it.

“Stay” typically requires a supersedeas bond; otherwise judgment collections may proceed

However, it’s not that simple. As a fairly firm proposition of law, there is no “stay of execution” pending the outcome of an appeal unless and until the party against whom judgment is obtained has posed a supersedeas bond in the full amount of the “cumulative total for all claims covered by the final order.” R.C. §2505.09.

… an appeal does not operate as a stay of execution until a stay of execution has been obtained pursuant to the Rules of Appellate Procedure or in another applicable manner, and a supersedeas bond is executed by the appellant to the appellee, with sufficient sureties and in a sum that is not less than, if applicable, the cumulative total for all claims covered by the final order, judgment, or decree and interest involved, except that the bond shall not exceed fifty million dollars excluding interest and costs, as directed by the court that rendered the final order, judgment, or decree that is sought to be superseded or by the court to which the appeal is taken.

In other words, after a party to a case obtains a monetary judgment against another party (typically, but not always, a plaintiff obtains a judgment against a defendant), absent a “stay” issued by the Court, the party holding the judgment may pursue collections against the party against whom judgment has been rendered while the appeal is being briefed, argued and decided. This means that the prevailing party may pursue foreclosure against real property, garnishment of bank accounts, attachment of wages and other collections actions, notwithstanding the slow process of a pending appeal that the opposing party believes will reverse the trial court judgment.

How a supersedeas bond is obtained

The bond can be issued by a private surety, such as an insurance company. But the insurance company wants to take zero risk in the issuance of that bond, so they will do so only upon posting of proper security such as cash, accounts containing stocks and bonds, or real estate with sufficient equity. And the outcome of this is that the eventual bankruptcy of the losing party, hiding of assets, dissipation of assets, death of the losing party, and other intervening events will not impair the collectability of the judgment by the prevailing party.

Posting of real estate as security

Another avenue to a “stay” order is the conveyance of property of adequate value with the Clerk of Courts, R.C. § 2505.11. And, under 2505.12, exempt from the bond-posting provisions are (i) fiduciaries who already have posted bonds, with surety in accordance with law, (ii) the state of Ohio and its political subdivisions, and (iii) public officers of the state and its political subdivisions who were sued only in their official capacity.

How it really plays out

How does this, then, typically play out? First, I find that losing defendants don’t just want to “write a check” to pay the judgment. Rather, they ignore it until collections actions are taken. Second, I have found that losing parties willfully ignore the plain language of Revised Code §2505.09 and ask for a bond amount less than the “cumulative total for all claims covered by the final order.” This request, in our experience, is routinely denied.

Then, there are circumstances in which the losing party simply can’t pay the judgment amount and therefore also can’t post a bond in that amount. In that circumstance, the losing defendant has the option to declare bankruptcy. In other circumstances, the losing party has no identifiable assets, but he must honestly submit to a judgment debtor examination and tell the prevailing party’s attorney the location of his assets. It is a bad idea — one we routinely reject — for a losing party to transfer assets to avoid collections upon loss in litigation. What this means, for example, is moving around assets for the purpose of avoiding the prevailing party from collecting is as bad of an idea as it is appealing.

So, when Gibson Bakery sued Oberlin College for defamation and obtained a $25 million judgment, the Judged ordered a stay of execution pending appeal only upon the posting of a $36 million bond. Last week, a $1.8 billion judgment was rendered against the National Association of Realtors and two other defendants. Because the matter litigated is under the Sherman Antitrust Act, the damages are to be tripled, likely bringing the judgment amount to $5.4 billion. One of the Defendants is a Berkshire-Hathaway company, which certainly has the cash sitting around for that, but will they post that for just one of their subsidiaries and to pay the freight for all of the defendants? For most parties, including the other two defendants, they simply would not have the assets available to them to post a supersedeas bond of that magnitude.

As litigants want to be on the “offense” in collections, as the defense — against a diligent prevailing party — is no fun and there are few places to turn to avoid “paying up.”

Conclusion

In your business affairs as well as your litigation, be prepared to accept the accept the consequences of your decisions. In litigation, those consequences can be both unexpected and expensive. If your plan is to postpone collections until appeals are exhausted, that may mean posting a bond for the value of the judgment.

Big Finney Law Firm “Tree Case” win upheld by 1st District Court of Appeals

By Christopher P. FinneyNovember 4, 2023

On November 3, 2023, we won a big victory for our client, a humble carpenter who lives in Clifton, at the First District Court of Appeals of Ohio. In the decision, the Appeals Court affirmed a verdict in our client’s favor for the removal of a large tree from his property without his permission.

At trial, our firm not only proved the trespass and actual damages but also proved malice by the Defendant by “clear and convincing evidence,” entitling the client to receive as part of his award reasonable attorneys fees and expenses for taking the case to trial.

A copy of Friday’s appellate court decision is here.

Background

We regularly counsel our clients on the time, expense and sometimes disappointing outcomes in civil litigation. It is a major part of the challenges our firm and our clients face in court. And typically small dollar cases — regardless of how just the cause may be — are just not worth pursuing.

Nonetheless, in 2019 we met with client William Chapel at his property and discussed the removal of his 50+ foot black walnut tree by his neighbor without permission. He came home from work one day, and the tree was gone, it was taken down, along with an old wood screening fence that had been on his property, all without his permission. We believed in the case and in the client, so we accepted the case.

Scorched earth strategy of defendants

It is typical in litigation that opposing counsel does not intend to win on the merits of their case, but rather by running out the clock and running the bill to heights that the amount in dispute will not justify, hoping our firm and our clients will “just go away.” Well, we never “go away.”

Victory at trial court

We here wrote about the $222,836.53 verdict that was rendered in our client’s favor last December before the trial court for the removal of that tree, the majority of that verdict being punitive damages, attorneys fees and out-of-pocket expenses associated with the exhaustive litigation path chosen by the Defendants.

Conclusion

In addition to the $222,836.53 award at the trial court, the Court indicated that attorneys fees and expenses incurred in collections matters and in appellate work would supplement the award, so this week we will be preparing a supplemental fee application, hoping to finalize the significant win for our client, and the delivery of justice to our community.

Thanks to our able and persistent team of Christopher Finney, Julie Gugino, and Jessica Gibson who saw this case through to the end.

Ohio Estate Planning surprise: A Last Will and Testament or Trust Agreement may not guarantee assets pass to desired beneficiaries

By Isaac T. HeintzOctober 20, 2023

Some people assume that his or her Last Will and Testament or Trust Agreement will determine who gets the assets upon his or her death. However, there are other documents that can override the terms of a Last Will and Testament or Trust Agreement and pass outside of the probate estate or trust estate.

These documents include completed designation of beneﬁciary forms for assets such as retirement accounts, life insurance, bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and real estate. We are seeing this as a growing issue, as many people have multiple accounts, with the majority of their net worth being held in retirement accounts. When the accounts are established or updated, it is frequent to see beneficiaries being designated without any thought to the individual’s overall estate plan. Therefore, it is imperative that the designation of beneficiary forms for these assets comply with current wishes, and are consistent with the terms of the Last Will and Testament or Trust Agreement if the same beneficiaries who receive assets by beneficiary designation are to receive the assets that are distributed pursuant to the terms of the Last Will and Testament or Trust Agreement.

Whether you’re ﬁlling out new paperwork, or moving an account from one institution to another, you will likely be asked to complete a new beneficiary designation form.

Failing to update beneficiary designation forms when life circumstances change is a common mistake. Some changes in family relations that may require updating beneficiary designation forms are:

Dissolution of a marriage (divorce) or separation.
Death of a family member.
Marriage.
Changes regarding child, grandchild, or other beneficiary.

With a 401(k), a married spouse is essentially automatically entitled to the assets in the 401(k) unless the spouse formally waives receiving the assets by the execution of a formal waiver in the presence of a notary public. If there is no beneﬁciary named and no surviving spouse, the employer’s plan documents determine who is next in line to receive the assets in the 401(k).

Under current Ohio law, payable upon death (“POD”) beneficiary designations can be made for bank accounts by completing the financial institution’s beneﬁciary documents. By the same context, transfer on death (“TOD”) beneficiary designations can be made for brokerage accounts by completing the brokerage firm’s beneﬁciary documents.

For real estate, a TOD Designation Affidavit is effective upon death allowing the owner of the real estate to transfer the ownership of real estate upon the owner’s death to whomever the owner designates by name. To be effective, this TOD Designation Affidavit must be recorded with the County Recorder where the real estate is located prior to the death of the owner.

Please contact Isaac Heintz (513.943.6654) of the Finney Law Firm for help with your estate planning and estate administration needs.

Ohio among top 10 highest property tax states

By Christopher P. FinneySeptember 23, 2023

A study by the Tax Foundation shows that Ohio ranks ninth among states in the nation for “Property Taxes Paid as a Percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Value” for 2023. Read the study here (click on table 33).

The top 10 and their rates as a percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Value follow:

New Jersey, 2.23%
Illinois, 2.08%
New Hampshire, 1.93%
Vermont, 1.83%
Connecticut, 1.79%
Texas, 1.68%
Nebraska, 1.63%
Wisconsin, 1.61%
Ohio, 1.59%
Iowa, 1.52%

Many of our readers will note that their own residential property taxes range from 2.25% to 3.5%, and we believe the reason is that the urban areas of Ohio have greater-than-average property tax rates than many rural areas.

Fraud Is Real: Don’t fall for it

By Christopher P. FinneySeptember 23, 2023

Fraudsters — both high-tech and old school — daily attempt to use real estate and other transactions to scam our law firm, our title company and our clients out of money and property. To date, we have not been hit (some of our client have been), but we are always on guard. Fraudsters forever keep trying.

As you are growing your business — and these tips apply to businesses large and small, old and new — it is a good idea — from time to time — to gather your financial team and key executives, along with your IT professionals, and simply have a conversation about “tightening things up” and avoiding common scams.

Are your checks (and cash) — incoming, outgoing and blank checkbooks — tightly secured and under watchful eyes?
Are your systems too open and accessible (a simple question such as automatic screen savers with passwords that trigger when an employee is away from his desk)?
Do you have proper insurance to protect your real risks?
Do you have proper training and systems in place to avoid common and emerging risks?

In the end, we all have some exposure. So, eternal vigilance, the latest technology protection and training of employees new and old, is the only answer. Part of this caution is constantly “tightening up” and “changing up” your transactional practices and security procedures to avoid the latest scam.

Here are some common scams we and our clients have seen:

In the low-tech world, fraudsters simply borrow money based upon false promises and representations. This is a time-tested and common scam. It is borne of two human instincts: (a) we want to trust people and (b) we are lured by the promise of a better-then market return on investment (if it’s “too good to be true,” it’s probably fraud). Many of these fraudsters have the appearance of business stability and financial success, but are willing to offer above-market interest rates for a personal or business loan. In the end, these loans are not properly secured and are not properly guaranteed, and the fraudster never had the ability or intent to pay back the monies.
Similarly, we have seen clients purchase assets or entire businesses that are subject to liens or governmental enforcement actions, or the purchase price is based upon false financial documents or hidden property condition. In a business transaction, be careful of slippery buyers, sellers and attorneys who can make fraudulent closing adjustments as the numbers are flying about in a closing.
Another low-tech fraud is thieves who rifle U.S. Postal Service mail boxes (both the blue drop boxes and mailboxes at your home or business), steal checks, and then change the payee and amount on the check and cash it.
Pay attention here: In the high-tech world, fraudsters hack into a Realtor, investor or title company email system, and steal their email signature and logo, and the details of an imminent transaction. Then, they establish a similar email domain (with maybe one letter changed or a “dot” added). Using the new domain, they send an email to the party who is to originate a wire with false wire instructions — instructions straight into the fraudster’s overseas wire address. The email by all appearances looks entirely legitimate and it’s from a name you know and with whom you actively are dealing.
We have written about sellers who don’t own actually property attempting to mortgage or sell the same. Read here and here.
Finally, fraudsters use sophisticated hacking and ransomware viruses to invade your critical computer systems. They corrupt your data and hijack control of your systems, relenting only when an exorbitant ransom has been paid. Extortionists have taken over critical infrastructure such as oil pipelines, hospitals, and municipalities. Most recently, the vendor running the Cincinnati Multiple Listing Service and dozens of MLSes nationwide was the victim of a weeks-long ransomware attack that was costly and disruptive.

So, how can you protect yourself in this world increasingly fraught with risk of theft of your valuable data, money and time by those with malintent?

Here are a few ideas:

Stay in your lane. Let lenders lend. In most cases, they are good at it. If a borrower is coming to you for a loan, it’s likely because he’s not eligible for conventional financing, and that ineligibility is for a good reason — he’s either lying, broke or both.
Carefully use due diligence and proper documentation. If you are going to lend money or buy assets or a business, perform the kind of due diligence a prudent and sophisticated buyer or lender would undertake and obtain appropriate security and guarantees of a loan. We discuss some of the pitfalls of private lending here. Similar risks can exist in buying assets and buying whole operating businesses. Part of this process is assuring that the borrower actually owns the assets he is selling or pledging (free and clear) and that your security interest is properly and timely perfected as against that asset. In a real estate-based loan, title insurance is a key way to assure this is so. In purchasing a business, the risk is even greater in that the corporate entity may have significant residual undisclosed liabilities or governmental enforcement problems. That seller — and your purchase monies — will completely disappear by the time you learn of the fraud. Finally, the #1 “due diligence item” is to know your employees, know your borrowers, know your sellers. The internet (and now artificial intelligence tools) is an incredibly powerful way to do background on parties to a business transaction, Use it. Cautiously heed the lessons of what you find.
Properly perfect security interests and document guarantees. When banks lend money, they want proper security for their loans and appropriate guarantors for their repayment. In most cases, banks are over-protected, and they want it that way. You do too. In both real estate and equipment-based transactions, we have seen borrowers pledge the same assets to different lenders as security for two or more loans. Obviously, in that circumstance someone is going to be left holding the bag. (Yes, fraudsters are that shameless.) Using proper real and personal property title examinations and lien searches and using appropriate documentation for loans and guarantees is critical. For example, in Kentucky, in order for a personal guarantee of debt to be enforceable, it must follow specific statutory requirements. Without that, it’s worthless.
Don’t put checks or other key financial documents in blue U.S. Post Office boxes on the streets and don’t have checks sent to a mail box at your business or residence that is accessible by others.
As to wire fraud, you can’t be careful enough.
- The sender of a wire should assume everything you see is a lie, the fax, the email, the logo, the wire instructions, the sender web site, the sender. Everything. Always verify everything via voice using a trusted and known telephone number for the wire recipient.
- If you smell a rat, don’t initiate the wire. Wait and check some more. Urgency — especially inappropriate urgency — is a key indicator of fraud.
- Read carefully the sender email addresses and the email. Many times the email domain of a fraudster does not exactly match the domain name with which you have been dealing. Note misspellings and grammatical errors in the text of an email that may come from a foreign sender or one unfamiliar with the parties and the transaction.
- Note last-minute changes, especially of wiring instructions.
- Note changes made on the Friday before a holiday weekend or before another holiday, and before the end-of-month, when Realtors and title company employees are more likely to be busy and careless.
Buy cyber insurance. Your property and casualty insurance agent can offer your business cyber protection. It requires you to use good practices for the insurance to invoke, but both the coverage and the required procedures are a critical part of best practices protection.
As to ransomware attacks, we have two pieces of advice:
- First, according to the Harvard Business Review (citing IBM), 60% of cyber attacks originate inside your organization. Either a malevolent employee or ex-employee intent on theft or vandalism (75% of attacks) or a negligent employee (25% of incidents) who falls for a phishing attack scam cause most losses. So, hire and retain employees of good character, monitor their activities, and carefully, comprehensively and quickly cut off computer access of former employees. Segregate access to data in your organization to those who need that data, and no one else.
- Second, every computer system is vulnerable. Every one. But homegrown (premises-based and self-maintained) servers are more vulnerable to a hack (in my opinion). As a result, we (a) have migrated the vast majority of our data into the Microsoft cloud (other providers are also available) (heaven help the world if they hack the Microsoft cloud!), (b) have segregated access to data to employees who need that access, and (c) have make serial backups of data that is not in the cloud.
Understand the risks, develop training and systems to avoid the risk, and train all of your employees on cyber security procedures.

As our attorneys can assist with due diligence and proper documentation (including title insurance) of your transactions, call us!

Protective Orders –> No thank you (or at least be cautious)

By Christopher P. FinneySeptember 11, 2023September 11, 2023

In litigation, parties may exchange thousands of documents, some of which may contain sensitive information about personal matters, privileged documents and documents containing sensitive financial and tax information. As a result, many times parties want to enter a “Protective Order” from the Court that allows for such documents to be produced with varying levels of agreed confidentiality protection. In this blog entry, we explore (a) the true and fundamental need for such protections (usually most of it it is just a waste of time) and (b) some of the abuses we have experienced under such Orders.

In short, (a) they should not be entered casually — but carefully and thoughtfully, (b) there needs to be escape or corrective clauses for inappropriate unnecessary designation of documents as confidential, and (c) there should be penalties on counsel for abusing the Protective Order privileges.

What is a Protective Order?

Typically, a Protective Order allows one party or the other to designate documents as “confidential,” and those documents so designated are protected from public release. Further, when sharing them with expert witnesses and other third parties (such as a technical consultant for organizing electronic discovery). That makes sense. The parties should not post on social media or circulate to competitors truly confidential business plans, financial documents and tax documents.

That’s fine as far as it goes, but then the Protective Order typically provides that filing any such document with the Court must be under seal. To me, this runs contrary to the principle that trials in the U.S.A are to be held in the public. Shielding the truth from public view should be done with caution, sparingly. But beyond that is the hassle of carefully making sure you follow the correct procedures. It drives up the cost of litigation, and the penalties for making an innocent mistake.

And then, beyond all of those protections, are production “for attorney eyes only.” Huh? We can’t share certain documents with our clients? Ridiculous in 99.997% of instances. What is so confidential that our own clients can’t be part of information sharing to develop their claims or defenses? Really?

Further many times Protective Orders contain “claw back” provisions wherein documents that are privileged from disclosure (such as attorney-client or spousal privilege documents) can be (or must be) returned as if unseen, and copies not retained.

Digging your own grave.

There is nothing so deadly in the law as concessions and admissions you yourself make, and a Protective Order is of the type that the Judge will say: “Well, you agreed to this.” Thus, a Protective Order is a grave you have dug for yourself. Sign on with great caution.

Judges hate discovery disputes.

Judges are busy with other things, criminal trials, search warrants, temporary restraining orders, and on and on. The rules of discovery are fairly clear and the parties should play fair. But they don’t. And then we must burden a Judge — who might have a murder trial in front of us — with playground disputes about non-production. It’s tedious and unproductive, but sometimes necessary. But this is complicated when a party thoughtlessly agrees to handle documents in a certain way that later becomes impractical or burdensome. Asking the Judge to unwind a dispute over the designation and use of documents as defined and prescribed by a Protective Order is more burden for the Court, a burden with which they don’t want to deal, and may simply refuse to address.

Judges are mixed on requiring Protective Orders.

As a result, I generally oppose the use of most protective orders — it just increases the cost and time for litigation. We are talking tens of thousands of wasted dollars and years of wasted time. So, the request for a Protective Order then ends up before a Judge.

In one active case I have now, we are litigating against a “pay lake” operator. He has five small lakes, and charges the public to fish in them, and charges for works, beer, coke and chips. That’s about the level of privacy and complexity of his finances. “He sells worms, for God’s sake, I say.” He insisted that his financials and tax returns be disclosed under a Protective Order. Huh? What is secret and confidential about selling worms and renting the right to fish in stocked lates at $15 per day? But sure enough, the issue of a protective order was pursued through the Magistrate and further into the Common Pleas Court with Objections to Magistrate’s decision – attorneys can and will fight over everything. Fortunately, in this already expensive litigation, the Court rejected the requirement for a Protective Order, allowing us to access the documents sought without restrictions.

In a second case, a personal injury case against a major public utility, the utility sought and obtained (and as discussed below, abused) the Protective Order, complicating already overly-expensive litigation.

Discovery abuse.

Then, once a Protective Order is in place, invariably opposing counsel will abuse his privileges under the Protective Order:

In the case of the public utility defendant noted above, they designated 1,500 pages of materials that they themselves previously had posted on line.
In another case, the Defendants marked more than 200 entirely blank pages as “Confidential.”
In a recent case, the Protective Order had been entered that included the right to designate hyper-sensitive documents as “For Attorneys Eyes Only.” The case was about residential (Single Family Home) property management. The opposing attorney designated Quick Books records of the financials of the properties as “for attorneys eyes only.” Now, this was ridiculous. What is so hyper-sensitive that we could not share property management financial details with our own client? It was ridiculous.

Confusion about use at trial.

Then, the funniest thing we had recently in a case with a Protective Order: The Order allowed use of the documents marked as “confidential” for “litigation purposes,” which to me means using them as Exhibits at depositions and at trial.

Well, opposing counsel threw a fit about me using a document — a second purchase contract that came after the one being contested at trial — as an Exhibit at Trial. Huh? If that’s not “litigation purposes,” I don’t know what is.

Well, the Judge agreed with me and we were able to use it at trial, but not after significant (15+ minutes) or discussion before the Judge and the Judge slobbering all over himself apologizing that this super-secret document had to come into the record.

One more thing to argue about.

The point of this blog entry is that I don’t like to use Protective Orders and they only should be requested — and permission granted — when they really are needed. Otherwise, they become one more thing the client pays to draft, negotiate and then endlessly argue over as the litigation progresses.

Just say “no.”

Finney Law Firm –> by the numbers

By Christopher P. FinneySeptember 10, 2023

As we approach our 10th anniversary (more on that to come later), here are the accomplishments and market position of Finney Law Firm, LLC and Ivy Pointe Title, LLC by the numbers.

17 attorneys.
9 paralegals.
3 office locations.
3 wins at the U.S. Supreme Court.
5 wins at the Ohio Supreme Court.
More than 18 wins at the Federal and Ohio Courts of Appeals.
8 certified class actions.
13,652 Tweets (now, “X”s).
867 blog posts.
63 newsletters.
9,794 successful real estate closings (est.).
$56 million in property tax savings (est.).
73 civil rights cases and taxpayer actions.

Thanks for being a part of it! Much more to come!

Ohio Employment Law: US Supreme Court makes it easier for employees to prove a right to accommodation of their religious beliefs

By Stephen E. ImmSeptember 5, 2023

Many people have become familiar with the concept of “reasonable accommodation” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Basically, the law requires employers to “accommodate” the needs of a disabled employee if it can be done reasonably, and without causing an “undue hardship” to the employer.

Less well-known is the employer’s duty to accommodate the religious beliefs of its employees. This duty arises under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of such characteristics as race, color, sex, and religion.

The classic example of a religious accommodation case under Title VII is whether an employer must excuse an employee from working on their Sabbath day if their religion prohibits it. As in the case of the ADA, the law requires employers covered by the Act to reasonably accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs of an employee if it can be done without causing an undue hardship for the employer.

But what constitutes an “undue hardship“? If providing an accommodation would cause some inconvenience, difficulty, or expense for an employer, how do we determine whether it is significant enough to be considered an “undue” hardship under the law? How much hardship is “too much”?

Recently, in a case called Groff v. DeJoy, the United States Supreme Court provided some guidance on this question. In doing so, it significantly increased the burden of proof employers must meet in order to show that a proposed accommodation of an employee’s beliefs would impose upon it an “undue hardship.”

Previously, the Court had suggested that any hardship that was more than “de minimis“ – meaning, “barely noticeable” – was enough to constitute an “undue” hardship in the context of a reasonable accommodation. This was a pretty low burden for employers to meet. In Groff, however, the Court held that the employer must meet a significantly higher burden. Specifically, employers must be able to show that a proposed accommodation would impose a burden that is “substantial,” such as by causing the employer to incur “substantially increased costs,” if it wanted to deny an accommodation on the basis of undue hardship. If it cannot show a “substantial“ hardship, then the employer must ordinarily accommodate the beliefs of the employee.

While the exact contours of this definition are still somewhat unclear, the Court is certainly saying an employer must now show much more than a “minimal” hardship in order to legally deny a requested accommodation of an employee’s religious beliefs.

Both employers and employees should be mindful of this new standard, and should seek competent employment counsel for guidance when these issues arise.

Sunset is Coming – Estate and Gift Taxes

By Isaac T. HeintzSeptember 5, 2023

Although there is a lot of conversation and worry regarding the issue, estate and gift taxes do not affect most households.

In Ohio, there is currently no estate taxes for state taxation purposes. The Ohio estate tax was repealed effective January 1, 2013.

There is a federal estate and gift tax that is 40% on assets subject to the tax; however, there is a large exemption that covers the average household.

The estate and gift tax exemption is the amount of money that can be transferred without having to pay estate taxes. For 2023, the estate and gift tax exemption is $12.92 million individual, and $25.84 million for a married couple. There will likely be a substantial reduction at the end of 2025. Unless new legislation is passed, the estate and gift tax exemption is scheduled to sunset back to the 2017 exemption amount (indexed to inflation), and will be approximately $7 million per individual, and $14 million for a married couple, depending on inflation over the next two years.

If your wealth exceeds your available estate and gift tax exemption, there is an opportunity to make gifts using the higher exemption amount prior to the sunset. For individuals or couples close to the exemption amount after the sunset, it makes sense to explore options in order to try to avoid making the federal government a beneficiary of your estate.

1 2 3 … 87 Next page