ONE DROPHow is buying a condominium different than purchasing a single family home?  In some ways, it is very similar, but in others it is radically different.

READ HERE >> Condominium versus Landominium — what’s the difference under Ohio law?

1.  3-D property purchase.

A condominium unit purchase is primarily acquiring title to a three-dimensional space defined by the interior walls, ceilings and floors of the unit.

When you purchase a typical single family home, you own from the “core of the earth” to “the heavens,” essentially a column of area that is shown on a 2-dimensional “plat of subdivision,” and within that column you own all the rights that accompany that purchase, subject only to the subdivision covenants and easements of record.

A condominium unit, on the other hand, consists primarily of interior “air space” defined by the interior surfaces of the planes that define the unit.

2.  Ownership of common areas.

With a condominium, if the unit does not include the foundations, roofs, exterior siding and other improvements of the project, who owns those things?  Well, the unit owners own those things as well, but the ownership is “in common” with all other condominium unit owners.

For example, if there are 15 buildings in the condominium complex, and 78 unit owners, then the roofs, exterior siding and foundations, parking areas and lots of other common areas are owned in common by all of the unit owners.  The owner of condominium unit 6 may also own, for example, a 1.75% interest in the common areas, which means he owns an undivided 1.75% interest in all the common areas.  Now, that 1.75% interest does not mean a whole lot (unless the whole project sells someday) except that (i) the unit owner must pay taxes on the value of his unit and on his percentage interest in the common areas and (ii) depending on the language in the condominium documents that may be his percentage share of expenses owed to the condominium unit owners association.

3.  Use of limited common areas.

All condominium property is either “unit” or “common area,” which are addressed above.  And common areas, under condominium law, are then further divided in the drawings and declaration into “general common areas” and “limited common areas.”

General common areas are those portions of the common areas that are designated for the full use and enjoyment of all unit owners, subject of course of the declaration and the rules and regulations established by the Board of the Association.

Limited Common Areas, on the other hand, are those portions of the common areas that are designated by the drawings or Declaration as being for the limited use and enjoyment of fewer than all of the owners.  Why would that be?  Well, let’s say that a condominium project consists of eight buildings, each of which has six units and an interior stairwell.  We could restrict the use of that interior stairwell to just those six unit owners.  Also, garages, parking pads outside a garage and exterior patios are frequently “common areas,” but common utilization would dictate that they are for the use and enjoyment of just that one unit owner.  This right can extend to storage bins in the basement of a building, external parking bays with car ports or just open spots designated for a single unit owner or to a specific building.

4. Extensive “contract” (declaration) by and among the unit owners.

Every condominium is formed by two primary documents: (i) The “drawings,” which carefully cut up the property into units and common areas by graphic depictions on paper, and (ii) a “Declaration” that is a lengthy document that constitutes a legally-binding contract by and among the unit owners.

As a starting point, it is sometimes difficult for my clients to comprehend that they are parties to a “contract” that they never signed, but under principles of real estate law, provisions of documents that are of record in the Hamilton County Recorder’s office are legally binding contractual obligations of the purchasers of property just as if they had signed the documents themselves.

Many condominium declarations will run 75 to 100 pages or more, and each of those covenants in a condominium declaration can be a legally binding obligation upon a unit owner.

A condominium declaration must contain the minimum requirements of Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5311, but other than those minimum requirements — which are fairly extensive — a condominium declaration can say pretty much what the declarant wants it to say.  Common areas that a condominium declaration addresses are:

  • Limitations on uses of the property, which may include — as just a few examples — not storing business trucks, boats and R.V.s on the property, whether the units can be rented to third parties, and whether business activities (such as a home office or a day care) can be conducted on the property.
  • Creating the Association and establishing how it’s Board of Trustees are is elected
  • Creating a a scheme for the determination, assessment and collection of condominium dues.
  • Finally, even though the external appearance is controlled by the association and its board, the association may be concerned with those things done inside a unit that impact the exterior appearance, such as what window treatments are visible from the outside.

5.  The Board is largely in control,

When you buy a single family home, you are the master of your own estate, subject to federal, estate and local governmental controls and subject to the declaration of the subdivision.  But when you buy into a condominium project you essentially are purchasing into a tightly-controlled community governed by a board of directors, which is like a mini-village council for your community.  They decide how the common monies are spent, and the rules governing your use and enjoyment of your property.  Not always, but generally their rights are pretty expansive as to the application of association monies, and the restrictions on the use of both units and common areas.

I have had clients who thought the Board was spending too much — and assessments were too high — and others who thought the Board was spending too little, and common areas were not being properly maintained.  I have had unit owners in older sections of a condominium project, which thought the Board was hoarding money to better maintain the newer section someday in the future.

And I saw condominium Board enact rules that dogs must be carried through common hallways to avoid their middy paw prints on the carpets (a real hardship for an older female client with an 80 lb dog) and associations enact rules against renting units, when the economics under which my client acquired title planned on rental income.

In each of these circumstances, the decision of the Board is pretty much final, or certainly difficult — practically and legally — to challenge in a court of law.

6.  The devil is in the details of the reserves.

OK, so follow along here.  Since you do not own your own exterior siding and roof of your unit, who pays to fix those when they need replacement or repair?  The association, of course.

Thus, when you buy a condominium unit, the association should be maintaining adequate reserves for the day when, for example, all the roofs need to be replaced.  And most associations do.  But imagine that you are the new buyer of a condominium unit where adequate reserve have not been set aside for those entirely predictable repairs.  Indeed, the pressure on every association board must be to keep those assessments as low as possible.

If the reserves are underfunded upon purchase of a unit, then invariably the association will at a later date need to assess everyone for that deficiency, or the project will decline due to poor standards of maintenance, and capital repair and replacement.  In other woods, the prior under-assesments, will later become a problem for newer buyers of over-assessments.

How does a buyer determine there are in fact adequate reserves.  Well, first one should get and review the finances of the association.  Buried within those financial documents should be the amount set aside for capital repairs and replacement — a capital reserve.  Now, it would take quite a bit of work to establish with every roof, siding, swear and driveway repair what is really needed to avoid a whopping assessment on unit owners, but you can get some idea by :kicking the tires,” and thinking throughout he variables.  We understand some associations have conducted “audits” of they reserve accounts with professional assessments of whether there are adequate funds to pay for future anticipated needs.

7.  Insurance is different.

In the property insurance world, there are homeowners policies, that cover the house and the contents, and public liability occurrences (someone gets hurt on the property) and apartment policies, which cover only the contend and the public liability issues.

In a condominium project,the association should be maintaining insurance in the event a fire or wind event damages or destroys  the roofs, walls and other common elements.  As a buyer, in additional to checking the finances of the association, it is prudent to assure his policy is in place and provides adequate coverages.

But what about those physical portions of the “unit” that the owner owns?  That is the subject of a special condominium policy with which most property agents are immediately familiar.  Read more here about condominium insurance.  A unit owner should obtain one.

8.  Living intimately, communally.

Condominium living is significantly different than single family home ownership in that generally neighbors are living in tighter quarters, they are paying the expense and upkeep responsibilities of their common buildings, and they establish all kinds of rules about how they are going to exist in this new, closer relationship.

Conclusion

Condominium living provides tremendous benefits to some, and serious drawbacks to others.  It’s a lifestyle choice that’s not for everyone.  And it simply is more complicated in terms of your relationships with others than a single family home existence.

We encourage our clients to carefully consider the contractual relationship they are entering with others when purchasing a condominium, and knowledgeably enter into that living arrangement rather than be socked with surprises at a later date.

Let our real estate team “make a difference” for you in your condominium purchase.  Contract Isaac Heintz (513-943-6654) or Rick Turner (513) 943-5661) to assist in your sale or purchase.

 

14002527561398974442CurtHartman_bio_finalIn the closing weeks of the 2013 Cincinnati City Council Elections, there was a well-funded undertaking targeting primarily Cincinnati’s African American voters, on radio and in print advertisements delivered door-to-door, to dissuade voters from casting their ballots for independent candidate Christopher Smitherman.  The printed fliers also pushed democrat Roxanne Qualls for Mayor and a democrat slate for Council.

Smitherman, who ran as an independent candidate that year, was a target of the more left-leaning democrat establishment in Cincinnati for challenging the then-democrat Mayor and Finance Committee Chair on a series of spending priorities, including demanding that the City fund its pension obligations to City retirees, opposing balancing the City budget with revenue from Red Light Cameras, and stop spending on the new Cincinnati Streetcar.

The “committee” that claimed to advance the political attacks on Smitherman was a brad new organization formed weeks before the election named “Cincinnatians for Jobs Now” and was funded with more than $300,0000 — a blockbuster sum for a City Council election with fewer than 60,000 votes cast.

However, Jonathan White, who is from Dayton, claimed in his deposition that he was the organizer and only member of the “Committee,” that he personally distributed door-to-door, 34,000 door hangers with no assistance from others, and that the $300,000 in contributions just one day appeared in his mailbox, unsolicited.  These ruses by White and Cincinnatians for Jobs Now are aimed at avoiding a finding from the Ohio Elections Commission that they engaged in criminal conduct by failing to file requisite financial disclosure forms with the Hamilton County Board of Elections of the income and expenditures of Cincinnatians for Jobs Now.

Maggie Thurber of OhioWatchdog.Org has a fantastic story on the discovery conducted in this matter to date by Mr. Hartman, and the trajectory of the case.  You may read that here.

Ms. Thurber is an award-winning independent blogger from Northwest Ohio whom I have gotten to know over the years.  She is an intelligent assertive woman who has broken news on one key scandal after another throughout the state that the mainstream media seem to miss.

Curt Hartman will continue to develop this story, including with an upcoming deposition of Rob Richardson, Sr. who appears to have been significantly involved in the effort despite Mr. White’s protestations to the contrary.

* * *

Read more about this story:

WCPO.Com: Elections Comlaint filed against mysterious group that funded ads >>

Media Trackers: Did Laborers Union Shirk Campaign Finance Law in Cincinnati >>

FLF blog: Ohio Elections Commission orders discovery against dark money organization >>

WLW Radio: Chris Finney discusses Cincinnatians for Jobs Now with Lisa Wells >>

1406920506KevinHopper_bioKevin Hopper was recently selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers of America 2015 in the fields of environmental law and water law.  Best Lawyers is a highly respected publication in the legal field that confers honors to those selected by other attorneys through peer-review surveys.

We are proud to have Kevin as a member of the Finney Law Firm and excited for him to be recognized by the Best Lawyers organization.

Read more about the Best Lawyers publication and organization here.

The practice of law, especially appellate litigation practice, mandates boatloads of patience, as is illustrated by this remarkable article in the Wall Street Journal: Appeals Court apologizes for misplacing case for five years.

The appellate grind

TGavelhe common appellate practice is: You work hard to brief and argue a case before a Court, and then you wait.  Some waits are mercifully short.  For example the average turn-around time in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals after oral argument is among the shortest in the nation at about 40 days (that may be as much as 12 months from filing of the appeal).  We won our 9-0 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Susan B. Anthony List case in 54 days.  It is sometimes really is remarkable.  But other courts — and decisions in specific cases — can take what seems to the litigants to be interminable amounts of time. We had two decisions issued earlier this year that each took the Ohio Supreme Court just under a year after full briefing to decide.

Waiting for a pot to boil

But, of course, it’s like watching for a pot of water to boil.  The wait times seem lengthy to the clients and their attorneys who are anxious for a decision, but it’s just another day at the office for the Courts — the Judges and their clerks.

The gentle nudge

And the way it works for litigators waiting for a decision is that you can call the Clerk and gently inquire about the status of a decision, and the answer is almost always the same: “we are working on it;”  “it will come out soon.”  And sometimes you wonder . . . are they really working on it?  Is it really coming out soon?  Did that clerk even really check to see that it’s not lost somewhere in the office under a stack of papers?  Hmmm.

My first appellate case

My very first appellate argument involved what I thought was a pretty simple, straightforward matter.  The facts were agreed and the record was very thin.  The single legal issue was not at all complex.  It just needed a decision from a panel of three wise judges.  After a year of waiting for a decision, I called the clerk for the Court of Appeals who thought a year was especially long to write an opinion too.  So, he checked.  He called me back and said “when I realized that that case was assigned to Judge so-and-so, I knew what the problem was.  I have handled it; it will be out soon.”

And sure enough, after about two or three days we finally had a decision.

It turns out that Judge so-and-so was nearing the end of his appellate career, and his cases had started to languish.  But an alert Clerk got it “unstuck” and magically we had a decision within a few days.

Thus, all these memories came flooding back when I read the Wall Street Journal story.

The 5-year wait in the Chicago case

First, a nod to the Court for admitting their mistake, and apologizing for it.  It showed some strength of character for the Judges — who could just as easily have brushed the error under the rug — to address the matter head-on.

But, you will note in the story that the clerks did get the phone calls from counsel, and the clerks gave them the standard brush-off responses.  No one from the Clerk’s office apparently followed up and checked on the status of the case.  So, we have answered that question: No, sometimes the Clerk has no idea of the status of your case, and did not check, before telling you “we are working on it” and “it’s coming out soon.”  Hopefully the Court in that case does follow through and fix their procedures to assure this does not happen again.

The bazooka: A writ of procedendo

There is another option for litigants waiting too long for decisions — they can file for a writ of procedendo to a court of superior jurisdiction.  The writ of procedendo is a prerogative writ from a higher court ordering the lower court to make a decision.  Essentially, you can “sue” the trial court or appellate judges to force them to make a decision.  For a decision sitting at the Common Pleas Court, one can file at the Court of Appeals.  For a Court of Appeals decision, you can file at the Supreme Court.  I don’t think there is anything you can do to speed decisions from the Ohio or U.S. Supreme Court.

We actually filed for one!

So, how do writs of procedendo typically work out?

Our team had a case before the Franklin County Common Pleas Court that was not the easiest of decisions — the issues of law were evolving.  But the record was short and the issues fairly narrow — the Judge just needed to decide.  Further, we knew the  issue would ultimately be decided in the courts of appeals, perhaps the United States Supreme Court.  The case had been pending 24 months, and we had fully briefed cross motions for summary judgment some 14 months earlier.  We called and gently inquired about timing to the Judge’s clerk — to no avail.  So, I called my co-counsel and said: “Do you really want to go your whole career and never file for a writ of procedendo?  Let’s go for it!”

Well, magically, it worked!  We got the attention of the Common Pleas Court Judge.  Within about 10 days of the filing of the appellate pleading, the Judge in the Common Pleas Court issued a decision alright — and he ruled against our client.  The matter presently is pending on appeal to the 10th District Court of Appeals.

Conclusion

The common wisdom is that this typically is how undertaking writs of procedendo work — you get a decision alright.  It’s like my mother used to tell me: If you want a decision right now, the answer is “no.”

So, generally you just wait, . . . and wait and wait.

Sometimes it is a short wait; other times you wonder if you will get a decision while you are still here on this earth.

But when the pot finally boils, you mostly forget all about the wait and either lick your wounds of a loss, or celebrate your win.  The wait fades as a distant memory.

chris_finneyThis article is an in-depth exploration of options to purchase real estate, a powerful tool for real estate developers to “kick the tires” of real estate before committing to buy, and an important right in tenants to purchase their property — rather than continuing to lease.

NOTE: this article exploring the distinction between Options, Obligations and Rights of First Refusal.

An option to purchase real estate typically places the prospective purchaser completely in the driver’s seat of a transaction — giving him the unfettered option to purchase real estate, usually at a fixed price.  So, the operative language for an option to purchase may look like this:

Purchaser [tenant] has the exclusive right and option to purchase the real property described on the attached Exhibit A during the term of this Agreement [Lease] for the price of $__________________.

There are several key considerations to options for both parties and then several components that should be addressed in a written option to purchase agreement.

Variable price

In addition to fixed-price options, the parties could agree upon all sorts of formulas for establishing the price, including:

  • If the option to purchase will extend out over a period of years, a CPI or inflation adjustment may be appropriate;
  • If the building is a multi-tenant facility, it may make sense to base the purchase price on gross or net income divided by a cap rate, or some other formulation;
  • Parties frequently base option prices on an appraisal, or multiple appraisals, to ascertain value at the time of the exercise.  Regardless of how “fair” or “objective” this may seem, appraisals on commercial buildings can vary widely based upon the appraiser and the assignment he has been given.  Appraisals are also very expensive; and
  • Finally, please resist the temptation to agree upon “market value” or “an agreed price” at the time the option is exercised, for “an agreement to agree to something later is no agreement at all.”

Get it in writing

As this article explains, the statute of frauds in each state will govern an option to purchase agreement — and as such it must be in writing and signed by the party against whom you want to enforce it, or as far as the law is concerned, the claimed transaction simply did not happen.

Contracts many times act as options

Most commercial contracts to purchase real estate are really options when you think about it.  What I mean by this is that the contingencies to the buyer’s performance typically are so open-ended in commercial purchase agreement, that the buyer can simply “opt” to buy or not buy before the close of a due diligence period.  Thus, following the line of thinking above, does it make sense for the buyer to have some “hard, forfeited money in the game to obtain this valuable right from a seller?  It’s at least something to consider.

An option is a contract when it has been exercised

Conversely, once a buyer exercises his option to purchase real estate, he is then obligated to purchase the real estate and the seller is bound to sell.  Thus, the instrument — upon its exercise — becomes exactly the same as a contract to purchase.  The question is thus, on what terms?

Because it may be too late to negotiate key contract terms after the exercise of the option, all of the components of a purchase contract should be called out in the option.  These should include, at a minimum: (i) quality of title, (ii) closing date, (iii) date of possession, (iv) tax and rent prorations, etc.  In a lease, many times the “option to purchase” is relegated to a single paragraph or section, but even if so, these contract provisions (along with the other components noted below) should be carefully addressed in that one paragraph.

Free-standing option or part of another instrument?

Often, an option to purchase is a component of another instrument — usually a lease — or it can be its own freestanding “option to purchase agreement.”  In leases, options to purchase is most common in situations in which the tenant is occupying the entirety of the real estate.  Further, an option to purchase can be an important component of sale-leaseback agreements and build-to-suit arrangements, both of which can be viewed as, at least in part, financing vehicles.  Regardless of the genesis and context of the option to purchase, the matters set forth in this blog entry are appropriate for consideration.

As to free-standing option agreements, it is common that the buyer of the option pay the seller a sum of money or other consideration for the option.  First, this is required under the contact principle of “consideration.”  Without something paid for the promise to sell, the contract may fail for lack of consideration.  Further, as the option gives the buyer the open-ended right to sell or lease the property to others once he exercises the option and buys the property, it provides substantial value to a buyer — this is something the seller may not want to just give away.

On the other hand, the seller may not be overly anxious to force a significant price for the option, as it is an effective way of marketing a property through a qualified developer that otherwise might sit unused and unsold for years.

The option period

During the option period, the seller is unable to convey clear title to a third party (because it would be subject to the option in the buyer), and the buyer typically performs his due diligence, markets the property for sale or lease to third parties, obtains zoning and other regulatory approvals, and obtains his financing.

Commonly, an option to purchase is for a fixed period of time.  So, for example, if the option is part of a lease with a three-year term, the option would run concurrent with that three year-term, or perhaps need to be exercised no later than 90 days preceding the lease expiration.  In the case of a term that runs concurrent with a lease, consider (i) options to renew and (ii) holdover periods.  How will the option be handled during such periods as well?  Some proposed language:

The term of this option will run from the execution of this Agreement through December 31, 2020.

– or –

Tenant may exercise this option throughout the term of the Lease and any extension or renewal hereof, provided that it must be exercised no later than 90 days prior to the expiration of this Lease.  The option is not effective during any holdover period.

Other times, the period within which the option must be exercised hinges off of the due diligence period.  So, if a buyer has six months to physically inspect the property and to obtain his zoning and other regulatory approvals for a new intended use, then the option period may run 60 days beyond the close of that due diligence period.  A problem, especially for a seller, with this approach is that if it is not clear that the buyer has to proceed with diligence with his inspections and regulatory approvals and there is no closed-end date for that due diligence period, then the option date never arrives, and title to the property is perpetually clouded until the buyer makes up his mind — which he may not be motivated to do.

We address that issue in this blog entry: Advanced commercial real estate: Seller beware, the contract that doesn’t end.  Typically language that bases the option period on due diligence inspections would not be used within a lease.  So, some proposed language for freestanding option to purchase agreements:

This option may be exercised by buyer up to sixty days following the close of the Due Diligence period as the same is defined in Section 3, above.

In any event, to properly draft an option to purchase, the period of time, or formula for determining the period of time, within which buyer has to exercise the option should be clearly stated.

The exercise

Perhaps where many options “fall down” in the drafting is in clearly explaining what the buyer must do to exercise the option, and that the option is then forfeited if not exercised within that period of time.  When, where and how the option should be exercised and when and how the option expires for non-exercise (or otherwise) are important components of the drafting of an option to purchase instrument.  Again, some proposed language:

This option may be exercised on or before the Expiration Date by buyer delivering to seller written notice of the exercise of the option by hand delivery or certified mail.

Non-exercise

What then happens if the option is not exercised within the option period?  The instrument should make clear that the option then expires and the buyer/tenant has no right to purchase the subject property.  Some model language:

If buyer [tenant] fails to exercise the rights granted by this option as and when provided for herein, then this option will be deemed to have expired, and buyer [tenant] will have no right to purchase the property.  Time is of the essence as to the option period, and the exercise of the option as provided herein.

Special lease provisions

When an option to purchase is contained in a lease, some special matters should also be considered.  For example, what if the tenant falls into default in the payment of his rent?  Landlords frequently want to either revoke option rights completely upon one default, or more likely suspend the tenant’s option rights during the period of any default.  Thus, the grant of the right may be preceded by the language: “So long as tenant is not then in default of any of its obligations hereunder.”  Other things to consider with options built in to leases are:

  • The due diligence inspections usually are not needed as the tenant is familiar with the property, and indeed may be the cause of conditions present at the property; and
  • Tax proration issues can be complicated if the tenant is paying the taxes as a part of his lease payments.

Title and recording

And as is addressed in this article on tenant’s rights in a receivership, the title to the property in which rights are granted by the owner is important.  For, if the property is subject to a pre-existing lease, mortgage, option to purchase or other instrument that precedes the new option to purchase, then the new option to purchase is likely to be subject to the right of the tenant or grantee in that prior instrument.

  • In the case of a mortgage, the mortgagee can wipe out that later-granted option with a foreclosure proceeding.
  • In the case of a tenant, the option to purchase would be subject to the tenant’s rights, which may well be under a long-term lease.
  • In the case of another optionee, the pre-existing option may take priority over the new one, thus defeating the right to purchase in the later instrument.

Now, to be clear, the seller of the option may have liability to the buyer for breaching the agreement, but for a buyer that has paid, say, $100,000 for the “rights” to buy a building, a worthless claim against an insolvent seller will be little consolation.

So, how does a buyer under an option, whether a tenant or a buyer under a free-standing option agreement, proceed with assurance that his option rights will take priority over the claims of others:

  • Perform a title exam and visually inspect the property as to tenants or other occupants (say, a neighbor with an encroachment) who may have pre-existing rights;
  • Get written subordination agreements from those with superior rights to the option to purchase or clarify that they do not have superior rights, such as through an estoppel certificate; and
  • Once priority is established through those first two steps, record the new option to purchase so that the world is placed on notice of the priority of the rights created by that instrument.

Conclusion

An option to purchase can be seen as a casual commitment by both the buyer and the seller, because it may appear preliminary to a transaction actually transpiring.  But, in reality, it usually grants powerful rights to the buyer that, once exercised become a binding contract.   Further, from the buyer’s perspective, before paying significant sums for property optioned or investing monies in due diligence work, it behooves the buyer to carefully consider and then address superior rights of others in the property.

* * *

If you need assistance with properly framing an option to purchase agreement, as buyer or seller, we encourage you to call any member of our real estate transnational team, Chris Finney (513-943-6655), Isaac Heintz (513-943-6655), or Rick Turner ((513-943-5661).  For litigation support regarding a dispute over an option to purchase, contact Brad Gibson (513-943-6661).

* * *

Finally, here are some good articles for additional reading on options to purchase real estate:

Option Contracts for Buying & Selling Real Estate from Lawyers.com >>

Who Really Needs a Real Estate Option Contract? from Realtor.com >>

Consider the Consequences of Your Options from the CCIM Institute >>

There are many law firms in greater Cincinnati, some special-purpose and some full-service, and there are many title insurance companies, commercial- and residential-focused.

But as a lender, as a consumer, as an investor, as a Realtor, what are the advantages to having a robust title insurance company coupled with a full-service law firm?  We think there are several.

  • First, from a real estate transactional perspective, we offer significant depth of experience and breadth of services to residential and commercial buyers and sellers, as well as lenders: closing and title services, leases, seller financing documents, and post-occupancy agreements.  We also can handle zoning and regulatory matters relating to your property.
  • Our litigators can vigorously litigate to enforce the contracts that we write and that you sign, or defend against such actions.
  • We can handle sophisticated matters relating to bankruptcy, probate administration, and the business components of a real estate transaction.
  • Finally, our property tax valuation team can assure you are not paying more in taxes than the law requires.

We strive to produce the same high-quality product and responsive customer service across each practice area of the Finney Law Firm and with Ivy Pointe Title.  We invite you to let us show you how we can “make a difference” in your real estate matters.

October 3 is the new launch date for the new residential closing regulations from the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (“CFPB”).  For the residential lending business, this means new waiting periods for closings, new forms, new technology, new reporting requirements, and new security procedures.

At Ivy Pointe Title, we have been preparing for this date for a long time, including educating ourselves, as well as Realtors and lenders with whom we work, on the new forms and procedures, adding new technology to meet the demanding requirements of the CFPB, and even changing our office layout to meet the demanding new requirements of the CFPB regulations.

One cautionary note we provide to our clients: As you are writing residential purchase contracts to close after late September, leave more time for the closing and be super-cautious about simultaneous closings where the seller sells one house, and tries to close on the purchase of a second house the same day.  The CFPB timing requirements may well foul up these otherwise well-laid plans.

We are ready to go on that launch date to continue to close your transactions — accurately and on time, every time.

In most circumstances, real estate law is a remarkably simple discipline: (a) read and understand the contract (or deed or declaration) and (b) the order of recording is the order of priority.  Now, these rules are not always followed, but they give us a general framework within which to practice.

However, two curveballs in real property rights are what we refer to as “adverse possession” or a “prescriptive easement.”

Adverse possession

An owner of land owns his property as against the claims of all others — it’s a pretty simple concept.  But in most states actual ownership can be “taken” from the owner — without a court proceeding — through “adverse possession.”  In Ohio the timeframe is 21 years and in Kentucky  it is 15 years.

In law school, we learn the acronym: O-C-E-A-N to describe the five claims the claimant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence to establish adverse possession.

  • Open
  • Continuous
  • Exclusive
  • Adverse
  • Notorious

The idea is that the claimant must in all manners have acted as the owner of the property, and have openly asserted to the world, continuously for the period of time in question, his ownership of the property.  This is a very tough standard, indeed.

A typical fact pattern we see as to adverse possession claims is that a claimant mows the law, trims the bushes, or operates an ATV across the disputed property (in fact owned by the neighbor) for a prolonged period of time.  The actual owner of the land comes to our firm to express concern about these activities.  Now, other than the public liability concerns for such activities (what if someone gets hurt!), there is a risk that the user will someday claim ownership of the land via adverse possession.  How do we prevent this?

It’s actually pretty simple to fix this.  If the user is using your land with permission, then the claim is by its nature not adverse.  So, I advise clients to send to their neighbors using their land a certified letter granting revokable permission for the use in question:

  • “Hey, I’ve noticed that for the past 10 years you have been cutting the grass on an acre of my property.  I wanted you to know how much I appreciate this and to give you permission to keep cutting my grass, until I change my mind.”  

It’s magical.  With one simple and polite letter, sent via certified mail and saved in a permanent place, you have eliminated any potential adverse possession claim, as long as it is sent before the 21 years (in Ohio) or 15 years (in Kentucky) lapses..

Now, there are many other issues with establishing an adverse possession claim:

  • What if there were multiple owners over that 21-year period of time?  That is OK as far as an adverse possession claim goes, but it presents a proof issue.
  • What if others have also used the land?  Then at best it is a prescriptive easement claim (see below).
  • Is “who pays the tax bill” dispositive as to an adverse possession claim?  It is persuasive, but not dispositive.
  • Can a tenant assert an adverse possession claim?  No, their occupancy is by its nature permissive, not adverse.

Prescriptive easement

A prescriptive easement claim is asserted and analyzed in the same manner as an adverse possession claim except:

  • The interest asserted is an easement interest, not a fee simple (ownership) interest;
  • The “E” from the acronym OCEAN is eliminated; the use does not need  to have been exclusive to establish a prescriptive easement claim.

The result of a successful prescriptive easement claim is not ownership of the disputed property, but rather establishes a non-exclusive easement to use the land in question for a specific purpose.  So, a shared driveway area or a common utility line would be classic examples of a claimed prescriptive easement.

How claim is asserted

I suppose neighbors could just acquiesce to the adverse possession of another, and lawyers and judges would not need to be involved, but that’s not typically how we see it working.  The way we see adverse possession asserted is that one neighbor sues another neighbor either (a) to stop an offending use or (b) to ask the Court to declare ownership of the subject property via adverse possession.  Because of the very long timeframes involved, the proofs can be difficult on each side.  Cases in which physical improvements have been built long ago are the easiest to establish an adverse possession or prescriptive easement claim.

Conclusion

The moral to this story is that a property owner cannot simply sit on and ignore his property rights; he must vigilantly defend them, lest their ownership just evaporate by his neighbor’s use of his property.  It does happen.

Most of the times this occurs in a commercial setting, it can be expensive and even interrupt operations of the business.  In the residential setting, most of these claims seem to settle as a result of the small value of the land at issue versus the tremendous cost of litigating.

I link below to few articles on adverse possession for further reading.

Adverse Possession Law >>

Adverse Possession: When Trespassers Become Property Owners >>

What Is the Difference Between Adverse Possession and prescriptive easements >>

If you become a party to an issue involving adverse possession or prescriptive easements, let the professionals of the Finney Law Firm “make a difference” for you.