Katherine Fox

Finney Law Firm  is pleased to to announce the addition of Katherine Fox to our administrative staff.  Katherine previously worked for our team, when she departed to Chicago to get her Masters Degree and then worked for Miami University of Ohio for three and a half years.  We are thrilled that she has agreed to re-join the attorneys and paralegals at our firm to further improve the service we provide to clients.

Katherine earned her B.A. in Political Science and History from Bradley University in 2006 and her M. Ed. in Higher Education from Loyola University Chicago in 2010.

Empower U not only has assembled a top-notch lineup of free seminars to enrich its participants (see its remaining fall programs here), but it now has placed some of the courses online — with a sophisticated interface that allows the audio, a video of presenters and the PowerPoint presentation simultaneously to be displayed.

Thus, Tuesday night’s program featuring Finney Law Firm estate planning attorney Isaac Heintz and financial Planner Bill Lyon of the Lyon group is now available on line for your viewing pleasure and education.

You may view it here.

Thanks to Empower U, Bill Lyon, Isaac Heintz, the full house of participants and another 17 on-line virtual participants for making the event a resounding success!

If you have questions after viewing the presentation or need help in planning the disposition of your estate, please feel free to call Isaac Heintz at 513-943-6654 or reach him via email here.

 

Heintz and Lyons

Finney Law Firm attorney Isaac Heintz teamed up with Bill Lyon of the Lyon Group tonight to present to Empower U — a free adult continuing education series — “10 Common Mistakes in Estate Planning.”  The event was well-organized and well attended, a credit to Dan Regenold and Nita Thomas, the organizers of Empower U.  The seminar also was presented “virtually,” which means via live, on-line video, and attracted a good number of participants online.

The video will soon be available online 24-7, and we will share the link when it is available.

Thanks to everyone who made this important event a success.

The lengthy saga that is the challenge to the Ohio statute making it a criminal offense to lie during the course of a political campaign reaches its latest chapter on December 10 at 9 AM.

Followers of our blog know that Susan B. Anthony List, et al. v. Ohio Elections Commission was first brought in 2010 to challenge the Ohio statute arising from the 1st District Congressional Campaign of Chabot v. Driehaus.  In that campaign, a third party group wanted to advertise that Steve Driehaus’ vote for OabamaCare was a vote in favor of taxpayer funding of abortions.  Steve Driehaus challenged that statement as a lie and a criminal offense with a complaint before the Ohio Elections Commission.

In response, Susan B. Anthony List challenged the constitutionality of the statute in federal court, and Finney Law Firm client, COAST, joined the suit asserting that it wanted to make similar statements but was “chilled” as a result of the oppressive enforcement scheme.

The District Court and the 6th Circuit found that Plaintiffs did not have standing as they “abstained” while the OEC matter was pending.  That issue ascended to the United States Supreme Court in 2014, resulting in a 9-0 decision in favor of our clients.  But all that Supreme Court decision did was place the matter back before the District Court.

In September of last year, Judge Timothy Black declared the statute unconstitutional and enjoined its further application — a complete win on the merits for the Plaintiffs.  That decision has been on appeal for more than a year to the 6th Circuit, and the December oral argument signals a decision by mid-2016 that, hopefully, will affirm Judge Black’s decision.

So, we have maybe another year of litigation over this issue, but soon the OEC’s control of speech in Ohio will be ended.

CFS
Chris Finney with accountants Tom Cooney and Crystal Faulkner on CFS radio

Today, Chris Finney appeared with accountants Crystal Faulkner and Tom Cooney of the Hyde Park accounting form of Cooney, Faulkner and Stevens on their WNKU radio program “CFS Radio.”

Finney spoke about two years of growth and client service at the Finney Law Firm.

Faulkner and Cooney not only offer quality accounting services, but also connect through others through their community involvement, their radio program, and use of social media.

Thanks for including us!

The Finney Law Firm is interviewing for a secretary/receptionist position at its Eastgate office.  The job description is below.  If you know of a qualified candidate, let us know!

Job Summary:

  • Answer designated phone lines
  • Greet and attend to clients and visitors of the firm upon arrival
  • Collect and distribute incoming mail and packages. Assist with outgoing mail as needed
  • Coordinate conference room scheduling
  • Provide administrative support to firm paralegal staff at the direction of the Director of Administration

Position Qualifications:

  • Possession of two or more years working experience in a medium to high volume law office
  • Ability and willingness to perform both reception and administrative functions
  • High degree customer service and a pleasant attitude on phone and within the office
  • Possession of strong communication skills both oral and written
  • Keen attention to detail, ability to perform multiple tasks, and work effectively with other members in a team setting
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Outlook, Word, and Excel

Please send your resume and cover letter to Anna J. Ausman at: [email protected].

 

 

Ohio has some incredibly well-written Sunshine laws, laws requiring transparency in open meetings and public records in the conduct of official business.  Indeed, Ohio’s laws are some of the best in the nation.

Unfortunately, the rights enshrined by those laws have been slowly and significantly eroded by a series of court decisions in Ohio, all the way up through the Ohio Supreme Court.

Last week, the Ohio Coalition for Open Government released a study of decisions of the Ohio Supreme Court that analyzed Sunshine Law decisions, and confirmed that the trend is against more openness, and in favor of governments that conceal records and keep meetings secret.

You may read the press release here.  The associated documents are linked in the press release.

The City of Portsmouth Ohio in 2014 enacted an ordinance requiring an inspection of real property before an owner could rent the same to a tenant.  The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law and the Finney Law Firm challenged that ordinance as being an unconstitutional warrantless search of real property violative of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Today, Judge Susan J. Dlott agreed, issuing this 17-page Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.  You may read that here.

This is a major victory for our clients, for private property rights, for our firm and for the 1851 Center.

 

  • posted: Sep. 23, 2015
  • Hemmer DeFrank Wessels PLLC
  • Uncategorized

Written By: Scott R. Thomas

It’s a nice fall day and you sit down with a cup of coffee to go through your mail.  You see you’ve got a letter from the County Auditor and you hold your breath.  You open the letter and breathe a sigh of relief when you see the bold words “This is not a tax bill.”  You read on and learn that the county thinks your property has increased in value.  For about 30 seconds, you feel good, as you reflect on the wisdom of your investment.  Then it sinks in that your Ohio property taxes are going up.  Not just one year but every year after that.  The notice typically provides scant information about the process and what rights you have as a property owner.  Many property owners are unaware of their ability to fight the county’s determination.  The good news is that you have the tools to contest an unfair valuation.

Years ago, the value of your property would stay unchanged until a sale occurred.  An “arm’s length” sale between strangers is always the best evidence of a property’s value.  Ohio counties have gotten more aggressive in recent years to increase their tax base.  County auditors will now increase a property’s value on their records if they feel they have any justification for doing so, whether it be a comparable sale down the street or a “drive-by” appraisal by a county employee or independent contractor.

The first step is to seek a review by the County’s Board of Revision.  You begin this process by filing a Complaint with the Board.  That sounds difficult but it’s really just a form that requires you to identify the property and explain why you think the valuation is unfair.  That is, you need to tell the County what you think the valuation should be and why.  At this stage, only broad brush strokes are required.  The Complaint form is usually available online.  The Complaint must be filed by March of the following year.  For example, if you got a notice this week, your Complaint would need to be filed in March 2016.

The Board will set your Complaint for a hearing.  That hearing will usually be conducted in May or June.  The hearing will typically be conducted at a conference room at the county offices.  The usual players who appear are the County Auditor, the County Attorney, the County’s appraiser, and staff members.  An attorney for the pertinent school district will often appear as well.  School districts jealously protect the auditor’s valuations because they get the lion’s share of these revenues.

Convincing the Board to overturn the Auditor’s value is a tall order.  To prevail, you have to convince the Board that if they affirm the Auditor’s opinion, their decision will be reversed on appeal.  To get that kind of traction, you must present evidence at this hearing to support your opinion of the property’s value.  You are not required to have an attorney at this hearing but you have little chance of success unless you hire an appraiser.  The appraiser you select must not only prepare a report but also be willing to testify at the hearing.  Without testimony—and the opportunity to cross-examine your appraisal, the Board may reject the appraisal report itself.  Consequently, you want to be careful to select an appraiser who not only knows how to value your property accurately, but who can also communicate that valuation to the Board effectively.  You need to work closely with your appraiser to determine the best strategy for calculating the value of your property.  While there may be different ways to get to your number, choosing the Cost Approach, the Sales Comparison Approach, or the Income Capitalization approach may have strategic consequences you need to consider in advance.

You will also have an opportunity to examine the Auditor’s evidence.  An attorney accustomed to these proceedings can be helpful in this regard.  The time a county takes to render a decision varies but you can typically expect a decision within 30 days.  If that decision is not in your favor, you can ask the Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) to review the case.  You only have a short time to make this choice.  Hiring an attorney at this stage is usually critical, if only because of the intricate procedural requirements imposed by the BTA.  A misstep on any of these procedural issues may result in the loss of your appeal on a mere technicality.  The BTA may conduct a hearing in Columbus but it will usually decline to hear evidence that was not presented to the Board of Revision.  This underscores why it is so important to present your entire case to the lower Board.  A property owner who saves the best witness for the BTA may find that witness never gets heard.  Because the BTA operates state-wide and has no connection to the County, some property owners feel they get their first objective consideration at this stage.

The BTA usually takes much longer to render a decision than the Board of Revision.  The tax bill based on the increased valuation will usually come due while your BTA case is still pending.  In this situation, your attorney can often negotiate an arrangement with the County to ensure your account is not deemed delinquent.

If the BTA decides the case against you, the decision may be appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.  As before, the Supreme Court’s review will be limited to the issues before the BTA.  The Supreme Court will refrain from disturbing a BTA decision if there are reasonable grounds to support it.  That is, they will not intervene to say the BTA should have given more weight to your appraiser’s testimony than the County’s.  Still, the Supreme Court will carefully review the BTA’s decision to ensure it conforms to Ohio law and judicial precedent.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; [email protected]; 513.797.2850.